The GEST model (Couwenberg et al., 2008, 2011; Joosten et al., 2013) is (frequently) used to quantify the climate impact of peatlands. GESTs (Greenhouse Gas Emission Site Types) are defined as homogeneous in terms of their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and are characterized by typical vegetation types. The vegetation serves as a proxy for estimating water levels in the peatlands. Since this is the main driver of emissions, it can be used as an estimate of the amount of carbon dioxide (CO₂) being emitted. Time, required staff (with specialized botanical training), geographic transitions (blurring), and limited scalability are the challenges in identifying GESTs. We expect a digitized solution for identifying vegetation to deliver:
- Rigorous monitoring to quantify emission reductions
- Increased accuracy in identifying vegetation
- Improved scalability (more area output with the same staffing and cost)
- Ability to employ staff without botanical expertise
- Continuous monitoring quality
In the case of financial products aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions (CO₂ certificates) or improving biodiversity (AUKM, ecopoints, CSRD, etc.), these points will make it possible to provide a monitoring system that allows for transparent and verifiable reporting of relevant changes in the monitored ecosystem. An automated, digital monitoring solution also promises to monitor the planned additional 50,000 hectares of rewetted peatland each year.